Skip to main content
NGO CPR
Tashkent skyline: the television tower and the city centre

A platform for monitoring, analysing and internationally benchmarking the quality of public governance in Uzbekistan

Reliable data, in-depth analysis and effective reform, moving governance in the right direction.

Key indicators

Show all

Voice and Accountability

-0.35

increase:+0.062022: -0.41

Political Stability and Absence of Violence

-0.18

increase:+0.042022: -0.22

Government Effectiveness

-0.23

increase:+0.052022: -0.28

Regulatory Quality

-0.12

increase:+0.032022: -0.15

Rule of Law

-0.27

increase:+0.082022: -0.35

Control of Corruption

-0.31

increase:+0.072022: -0.38

Quality of Public Services

Center

-0.22

increase:+0.042022: -0.26

Policy Quality

Center

-0.25

increase:+0.032022: -0.28

Participation and Inclusiveness

Center

-0.19

increase:+0.052022: -0.24

These three measures are not part of the World Bank WGI methodology — they are the Center's own estimates.

How Uzbekistan's scores have moved

Select an indicator
Period FromTo
How Uzbekistan's scores have moved
Year Government Effectiveness
2014 -0.55
2015 -0.52
2016 -0.48
2017 -0.45
2018 -0.41
2019 -0.38
2020 -0.36
2021 -0.32
2022 -0.28
2023 -0.23

Regional comparison

Show all

Government Effectiveness, 2023

Regional comparison
Country Value
Kazakhstan 0.12
Uzbekistan -0.23
Kyrgyzstan -0.51
Tajikistan -0.68
Turkmenistan -0.85

Key findings

Largest improvement

Rule of law improved the most: from −0.35 in 2022 to −0.27 in 2023 (+0.08).

Lowest score

Voice and accountability remains the lowest score: −0.35, the 12.4th percentile worldwide.

Above the regional average

On government effectiveness Uzbekistan (−0.23) is above the Central Asian average (−0.43).

Long-run trend

Over the past ten years all nine indicators show slow but steady improvement.